The reasoning behind saying that pollen counts are higher and linking that to CO2 without doing some investigation is spin and presenting that as "fact" is "brainer no-using".
Logic and reasoning often have nothing to do with what is really happening, which is why theories are boundless and anything can be "proven" with rhetoric.
LOL There have been many studies that prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that higher CO2 does cause higher pollen counts. It's a given. No spin at all. I can see all the arguments for and against what is causing global warming. Let's not let the spinning fog up real scientifically proven ideas. Just because Gore and gang have no credibility left doesn't mean you can throw a wet blanket over all our scientists and their findings.
No spin at all. I can see all the arguments for and against what is causing global warming. Let's not let the spinning fog up real scientifically proven ideas. Just because Gore and gang have no credibility left doesn't mean you can throw a wet blanket over all our scientists and their findings. 
