FGF Advertisement Sponsor

Forums

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 1
B
Member
Member
B Offline
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,405
Likes: 1
That 29 degrees number was just what I have the best power and torque with on the dyno. Every combo is different what is good for mine may not be good for yours. On the dyno we usually tune for max power, which is good if you run the car at max power, mostly race, but most of us use our cars for purposes other than race. You also have to consider what your lower rpm and cruise rpm will be like with a lower setting. When I first installed and ran mine I set the timing to 29 total, that only gave me 8-9 initial. My car ran roughly and hot at idle with the low advance. I didn't know at the time my vacuum advance wasn't working. After repairing the vacuum advance I got a smoother and cooler idle but a slight ping on partial throttle pulls, especially up hill. At WOT it was fine as the vacuum advance goes to zero with the throttle plates wide open but I was getting too much advance in some instances. I had the timing curve I wanted but needed to lose the advance at part throttle yet still have more advance at idle and low rpm. That's why I welded the slots on the low advance side instead of stopping the advance on the high side. I still get the curve I want up to 3200-3400 when the mechanical is all in. The joys [pain] of having a modified engine. Normally one would set the initial from 10-14 and the mechanical to 32-36, with the vacuum operating one would have around fifty at cruise for a nice cool and economical run.

Is your 400 stroked and bored to 463 cid now or is that a planned build?
Your 62 heads will have a small chamber, 72-75 cc, it may not be the timing that is giving you the detonation but the compression. A lot of factors to consider when facing detonation, grade and quality of fuel, quench, heat dissipation, static and dynamic compression ratio, timing, driving style, weight, gearing, cooling, etc.
You say you want high torque from your engine. That's a rather large camshaft, good for high rpm horsepower but you'd most likely get more torque at lower rpm with a smaller cam. I don't know how the 62s flow but you'd have to flow fairly well to use that cam.


Al
Google AdSence Sponsor for FGF Forums
Entire Thread
Subject Posted By Posted
557 is "terrible" 68strokr 08/28/14 04:36 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" bigchief 08/28/14 06:09 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 08/28/14 07:49 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Region Warrior 08/28/14 08:48 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bronze Bird 08/28/14 10:38 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Banshee 08/28/14 11:24 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 10/19/14 04:06 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Firebob 10/19/14 08:07 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 10/21/14 04:39 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 10/25/14 07:00 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" frankyboy428 10/26/14 12:32 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 10/26/14 07:00 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 10/29/14 04:12 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 10/29/14 04:08 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 10/31/14 03:16 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 10/31/14 05:02 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 07/25/15 06:45 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 12/29/15 06:40 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" bigchief 12/29/15 06:46 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 12/29/15 11:40 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 12/30/15 04:54 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" bigchief 12/30/15 05:21 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Firebob 12/30/15 05:32 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 12/30/15 07:26 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" Bluebird428 12/30/15 07:44 PM
Re: 557 is "terrible" bigchief 12/31/15 05:14 AM
Re: 557 is "terrible" 68strokr 12/31/15 06:58 AM

Link Copied to Clipboard
Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics35,534
Posts298,850
Members8,861
Most Online19,810
Feb 1st, 2026
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 2,110 guests, and 46 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
zinger223, MB13, Drevard, LarryK, boomstick08
8,861 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
Geoff 3
Gordy 1
LarryK 1
Top Posters
Bjorn Sefeldt 20,054
Fbody69 14,265
Yellowbird 11,905
68tpls400 10,337
salmon38 7,719
Firebob 7,495
Banshee 7,408
Gus68 6,758
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Photo Gallery
My latest 67 vert project rust bucket
My latest 67 vert project rust bucket
by Firebob, December 22
My weekend warrior
My weekend warrior
by Two67Firebirds, August 1
Cool dragster
Cool dragster
by Gus68, March 26
67 at Warbird show
67 at Warbird show
by Revvingup, December 31
With the old hood on.
With the old hood on.
by Firebob, July 29
Forum Search
NOTE: Search FGF Forums functions differently than the Search found at the top
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 8.0.0