I've got somewhat of a muscle car and it eats gas. 91 octane costs $7.84 a gallon on this island. I'm going to drive it whether I get 14 MPG or 44 MPG. That isn't the point I was getting at. I was just curious about the difference between mileage with the two camshafts. I wasn't complaining about it, just thought is was curious. I'm sorry I brought the subject up! If I wanted an economical choice I wouldn't have bought another 60s Pontiac with a large displacement. My GTO was lucky to get 8MPG. I would have spent my money on a new car with all the bells and whistles including a screen on the dash for all those guys who don't have a clue how to drive or how to get from point A to point B without electronic help. I'll refrain from posting "I wonder why" subjects in the future.
wovenweb; Not many posted that high here. We have a couple of highways posted 75 MPH. Of course all the tree hugging wingnuts are protesting. Telling us driving that fast is going to cause California to sink into the ocean. They may succeed in getting it lowered, who knows! They're slowly taking the fun out of driving.
