How close is it to original? And how hard to do a console? Have a 68 with a couple dents in the front section i want to straighten, and the rear half is faded.
you could straighten it and then touch it up with paint the clear it. the rear part might clean up but a matching the grain might be impossible. I in painted some scratches and looks gerat
Was the original burlwood painted on or was it a overlay? If the original burlwood is faded and or chipped, are the kits that you can buy from Classic or Year one very good quality?
Jim, that actually looks nice from a dist. but I can not imagine what this would look like in person. I just can't imagine that stuff making the bends and the edges etc. All I can ever imagine is that crap from the 70's that people uesed to put on darn near everything, used to be call contact paper?
I put one on a console in a 69 that I sold. As far as the edges and bends it looked great. And from a distance of 10 feet it look very good. The only drawback is, up close it doesn't look exactly like what you are used to seeing.
I was looking at my dash the other day where it is pealing back a little. Is the applique paper thin? On my dash it looks like there is something else under there like a hard board or something. Does the applique kits come with the holes already cut, or is it one big piece?
The material is quite heavy...you may be looking at the original metal burl panel underneath. I found the adhesive very good, make sure you use plenty of silicone polish remover to wipe/prep the original suface as somewhere down the road someone likely used armour all on it, and if not removed will cause the adhesive to be compromised.
Do you install it over the top of the original burlwood, or do you remove the org stuff first? Can you find bigger pieces of the applique? As I want to customize my dash by removing the A/C controls and the center A/C vent, and install my gauges there. Are the pieces for the console bigger?
Yes, I installed over the existing stock burl. Not sure about your second question, you can buy the dash piece as well...but it will have the heater control cutout..
As far as a bigger piece to suit your application, that would be a question to ask the supplier...they may be able to get you a piece.
racer, I just finished my dash redo a couple of months ago. The applique I used was around $100 and it came with the heavy backing. The holes come already cut but they aren't perfect. They needed a few small adjustments. Also the color was darker than my original. All in all after reinstallation I think it looks pretty good. There are some suppliers that sell a less expensive applique but I have no idea what it looks like.
Definitely not correct. Never seen any that style/color.
BTY, think a console would servive ok being shipped wrapped with bubble wrap inside a card board box?
I like to use those hard corner pieces that come in the corner of an appliance box for stiffening/reinforcement. They are stiff and would stop flexing which would crack an old console. Go dumpster diving at your local appliance store to find them.
thanks nashvil, you can get the small paint bottles from duplicolor at any retail store. I used shelac for clear which dosen't work in the cold.its an easy fix. use a semigloss clear I had holes near the clock fior a gauge cluster in a slight angle can be seen. I used filler in the holes then mixed the color slowly untill i go the right base color the swirl in the black. the console has be recolored with a epoxi paint which will not come off. a new liner of the similar material feltwas installed using contact cement. and the shifter hole has been recolored with a oem paint color and the clock has been rebuilt by me and painted the same oem color.
I forgot to say the console can be stripped. It has a laquer finish on it. I used laquer thinner and a clean cloth an slowly cleaned it. it removed the waxes and smoke and what ever contamination was on there.
I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not sure. I feel like I am diagonally parked in a parallel universe. 1968 400 convertible (Scarlet) 1976 T/A - 455 LE (No Burt) 1976 T/A New baby, starting full restoration. 1968 350 - 4 speed 'vert - 400 clone (the Beast!) 1968 350 convertible - Wife's car now- 400 clone (Aleutian Blue) (Blue Angel) 2008 Durango - DD 2008 GXP - New one from NH is AWESOME! 2017 Durango Citadel - Modern is nice! HEMI is amazing! 1998 Silverado Z71 - Father-daughter project 1968 400 coupe - R/A clone (Blue Pearl) (sold) 1967 326 convertible - Sold 1980 T/A SE Bandit - Sold
Here is a photo of the console I built a few years back, with the help of several members here. Fellow member Quenton (PMI USA) provided the beautiful Burlwood Applique. Quenton is one great guy.
We didn't have the proper 4-speed shifter pieces at the time, and instead just used a generic boot.
'68 428 HO M3 Monster, 4-on-the-floor! Need I say more?
Interesting 4 speed boot....I have the original boot bucket and the wrong flat shifter arm as you have, and the original owner had to notch out the front of the boot bucket to move the shifter forward...I'm looking for the original round shifter arm and then I'll replace the notched boot well.
I had my car at the show, the bugger looked it over and in a snotty manner, said "wrong shifter arm".....I said perhaps you are right, and when you have the "right" attitude, I'll chat with you..LOL
At any rate I too am happy with my applique...we will see how the sun treats it over time....
Last edited by Dave's White Rock '68 Droptop; 03/27/0802:17 AM.
Dave, how sure are you that the flattened Hurst shifter arm is not right for our FGFs? I thought I had a correct arm, just not the original handle (Ball) and of course console shifter plate piece.
'68 428 HO M3 Monster, 4-on-the-floor! Need I say more?
Well, I may be wrong, but that is what some sh!thead told me at the big car show...and I figured that the notch in the bucket was because of the different profile of the arm...ie a round one would not hit the front edge in first/third as mine does.
Anyone else know...I would like to put this one to rest, for the next time the individual comes around to blaspheme my bird
Originally Posted By Dave's White Rock '68 Droptop
Well, I may be wrong, but that is what some sh!thead told me at the big car show...and I figured that the notch in the bucket was because of the different profile of the arm...ie a round one would not hit the front edge in first/third as mine does.
Anyone else know...I would like to put this one to rest, for the next time the individual comes around to blaspheme my bird
you never know what "they" will tell you.... I was at one show where the JUDGES! asked me what the "containers" in the trunk were... I asked him to point them out... those were the cocktail shakers = vibration dampeners...they had no clue!
Mine is an early 68 (built October 67) Perhaps they used some extra 67 flats they had for a month or so...[censored] thing still hits my bucket tho.....
If it hits the bucket it's usually because it's not going straight up and down in the hole. If it's angled much at all it will hit. My 67 has the flat shifter but not quite right. It's angled and it just barely hits too. I need the correct flat shifter.....
My 67 has the original non Hurst(flat lever) shifter. Remember reading somewhere(maybe HPP) that Pontiac switched to Hurst shifters in 68. Dont rememder if they had the Hurst name on them, or round vs flat. If i think about, i'll dig out mag's. Seems to me it was the old FB and GTO year by year difference series they ran years ago.
great vikki, mine has hurst on the side of it as well..the previous owner notched about a half inch wide x 3/4 high on the well where it was hitting...and after rebuilding, rebushings etc...still needs most of it. Ill snap some pix tonight.
Interesting info here, and it seems late 67/early 68 had some production changes where multiple configurations could actually be "correct" due to mere manufacturing timing.
I researched my shifter linkage long ago and thought my "flat" one was correct for my 68. But I'll be happy to say its not original if someone can nail this.
To clear the record, are there folks out there that say the original FGF shifters did not have any true Hurst markings on them? I'll have to go back and look again but I'm certain this is not correct. I think many original Hurst FGF shifters were clearly marked HURST.
'68 428 HO M3 Monster, 4-on-the-floor! Need I say more?