The Robin Hood theory (take from the rich, give to the poor) doesn't work. Robin Hood pockets the bills and drops the nickels and pennies to the poor.
If you think that corporate greed, corruption, personal greed, living to excess, etc. will be stopped by electing the Democratic candidate, you are wrong.
If you think someone is "rich" with $250,000+ income, travel around the country a bit and put it in perspective. There are some localized economies where the buying power of $250,000 is equivalent to $100,000 in Metro Detroit.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
The Robin Hood theory (take from the rich, give to the poor) doesn't work. Robin Hood pockets the bills and drops the nickels and pennies to the poor.
If you think that corporate greed, corruption, personal greed, living to excess, etc. will be stopped by electing the Democratic candidate, you are wrong.
Who said anything like that? Lets keep it simple because it is; People who make over $250K a year will pay just 3% more in tax in just the portion of their income above $250K. That's how it was in the 90's. You would be surprised at how much revenue that brings in to pay off our country's debt just like we did in the 90's. This isn't about Robin Hood, LOL.
What is seldom stated, is that the "rich" pay most of the federal income taxes already. Actual IRS data (I can find the IRS webpage source if someone wants to verify it.)
The top 1% of earners now pay 40% of federal income taxes. The top 10% pay 70%. The top 50% pay 97.1%
The only way to further stick it to the rich and provide a tax "cut" to the 95% Obama quotes is by paying many who don't currently pay any taxes. Obama's "disribute the wealth" and "share the wealth" is exactly that. There is a term for that; socialism.
Ah. It's not the greedy individuals with no morals that cause problems, it's the "republicans that have been raking in wealth". The lobbyists contributing millions on behalf of auto dealers, unions, alcohol distributors and so on don't have any influence?
What is seldom stated, is that the "rich" pay most of the federal income taxes already. Actual IRS data (I can find the IRS webpage source if someone wants to verify it.)
The top 1% of earners now pay 40% of federal income taxes. The top 10% pay 70%. The top 50% pay 97.1%
The only way to further stick it to the rich and provide a tax "cut" to the 95% Obama quotes is by paying many who don't currently pay any taxes. Obama's "disribute the wealth" and "share the wealth" is exactly that. There is a term for that; socialism.
This talk is 'fear tactics' just like what got us in the Iraq war. Don't be sheep... And why would you want to bash just one candidate for touting tax cuts when they both talk of tax cuts! LOL
I'm sorry but I can't feel sorry for someone who has to pay 3 % more tax in the portion of their income over $250K. I've paid the top tax of 36% when I was only making $90K. We are only asking billionaires to pay 39% of their income(over $250k) to help out the country. If you keep being so stingy that you can't pay 3% more tax in your income over $250K then you might as well sell the Grand Canyon to the Chinese because that's where we are headed if we do not pay off our national dept.
Look at the definition of "top 1%" in those two reports. Jim, do the math and see what your "3%" means.
In tax year 2003, the threshhold for the top 1% was $295,495. Average taxes paid by these individuals was 34.27%, or $101,266.
In tax year 2006, the threshhold for the top 1% was $388,806. Average taxes paid by these individuals was 39.89%, or $155,094. The "rich" that you so despise, that build the economy that you've taken advantage of, that provided you with the funds to retire with a reasonable standard of living, had to pay 53% more in taxes in 2006 than in 2003.
Your social equality candidate is ready to gut this country and turn it into a UN acceptable sheep. Turn and fight while you still have a chance.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
It's not that simple. Taking more from a few does not fix any problems. Especially with the current economic climate.
Some thoughts: high taxes on short term capital gains, to deter market speculators. Not on total gains for the year, as that can be manipulated by selecting the most tax-advantageous lots, but on each transaction. Speculators are definitely contributing to the stock market rollercoaster, as are underfunded players on margin in a falling market. Perhaps lower the taxes on long term capital gains, with rate declining according to number of years held, to encourage long term investment and market stability.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
This is all a HUGE waste of time. Like I said in another thread, "There are no undecided voters at this point and you will not change anyone's mind". I stated why I'm voting the way I am as simple as I can write. I'll see you all on Wednesday morning, waving my American flag, ready to move ahead with the candidate that wins.
Obama and the Democrats will let the Bush tax cuts expire - which will result in the largest tax increase in our history - affecting everyone from $40k on up.
Obama will immediately forfeit the global war against islamic extremists no matter where it is fought.
Obama will cave in to Russia and stop the construction of the missile shield.
Now what does affirmative action do for my family?
What do gay rights do to benefit my family?
How is abortion funded by the government desirable?
Is Canada's heathcare system better?
Do we care which candidate the Europeans like better?
We better care which candidate our enemies like better (hint - his name sounds like theirs and he's a coward).
Please vote McCain in 2008.
By the way, McCain is a liberal Republican chosen by the press and the liberal early primary states with open primaries. I like Sarah better!
Jim, I don't expect to change your mind, you are stubborn and set. But the untruths you laid out there required factual responses.
If all those economy-killing promises are enacted, I will turn my business into a home based, low overhead, no employees shop. I can't afford any more of a tax hit and stay in business. The state tax tips the balance.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
"There are no undecided voters at this point and you will not change anyone's mind".
Actually, in the battlegrond states there are large numbers of undecided voters, about 5-13% depending on the poll. Plus there are many Democrats disenchanted with Obama (perhaps more than 20%). When polled they may lie to polsters for fear of who is taking the poll (their union, local Democrats, etc.). There are many unhappy Joe the Plumbers and Hillary supporters. I believe this election is going to be much closer than the mainstream media is predicting.
The Mccain campaign is finally running some ads in the battleground states that will really make voters think before pulling the Obama lever. The Jeremiah Wright ad is stunning.
"There are no undecided voters at this point and you will not change anyone's mind".
Actually, in the battlegrond states there are large numbers of undecided voters, about 5-13% depending on the poll. Plus there are many Democrats disenchanted with Obama (perhaps more than 20%). When polled they may lie to polsters for fear of who is taking the poll (their union, local Democrats, etc.). There are many unhappy Joe the Plumbers and Hillary supporters. I believe this election is going to be much closer than the mainstream media is predicting.
Undecided, fibbers, dumb polls like the ones I've seen on AOL and YAHOO. LOL I'll see you Wednesday waving my American flag. Have fun voting. Be proud to be an American whichever way it goes. And remember; We are the 'United States of America' Not the 'red and blue states of America'.
obamas record: endorsed a complete ban on hand gun ownership voted to ban the use of firearms for home self defense proposed a bill to increase federal taxes on guns and ammo by 500% he opposes right to carry laws voted to ban ammunition used for hunting and sport shooting if you own a gun,sell now.if you ever need one to defend yourself;you will be [censored] out of luck.you better hope the police are not busy
This is ALL lies from top to bottom.
that is fact jim.do your research instead of running your mouth.
obamas record: endorsed a complete ban on hand gun ownership voted to ban the use of firearms for home self defense proposed a bill to increase federal taxes on guns and ammo by 500% he opposes right to carry laws voted to ban ammunition used for hunting and sport shooting if you own a gun,sell now.if you ever need one to defend yourself;you will be [censored] out of luck.you better hope the police are not busy
This is ALL lies from top to bottom.
that is fact jim.do your research instead of running your mouth.
I have; endorsed a complete ban on hand gun ownership; only assault, full automatic weapons voted to ban the use of firearms for home self defense; same as above proposed a bill to increase federal taxes on guns and ammo by 500% he opposes right to carry laws; Again, just for assault weapons voted to ban ammunition used for hunting and sport shooting; YES. You are right. But it was for LEADED ammo that is hurting the birds. That was a no brainer!
And John McCain voted EXACTLY the same on all the votes....
Obama and the Democrats will let the Bush tax cuts expire - which will result in the largest tax increase in our history - affecting everyone from $40k on up.
Obama will immediately forfeit the global war against islamic extremists no matter where it is fought.
Obama will cave in to Russia and stop the construction of the missile shield.
Now what does affirmative action do for my family?
What do gay rights do to benefit my family?
How is abortion funded by the government desirable?
Is Canada's heathcare system better?
Do we care which candidate the Europeans like better?
We better care which candidate our enemies like better (hint - his name sounds like theirs and he's a coward).
Please vote McCain in 2008.
By the way, McCain is a liberal Republican chosen by the press and the liberal early primary states with open primaries. I like Sarah better!
No wonder you are scared John! If I believed all these 'fibs' I would be voting for McCain too! LOL
Jim, anything bigger than a .22 is armor-piercing? Semi auto shotguns are assault weapons? This is all about CONTROL, and getting cozy with the UN.
Yes, I have a CCW. Yes, I have a small arsenal of weapons including thousands of rounds of ammunition. Does that make me a criminal? Am I a threat to society as a whole? Not under the laws that exist today. Why would I want controls over my ownership of my guns? It's my second amendment right to own them and use them.
If you don't like guns, translate it to cars. Suddenly, it's illegal to own a vehicle that does over 55 mph. It's illegal to own a vehicle that can do zero to sixty in under 10 seconds. It's illegal to own a vehicle that gets less than 35 mpg. Would you consider that unreasonable control? After all, it's not like they took away your right to drive. So what if you didn't break any laws while you had that fast car, too bad for you, someday you just might and we can't risk that.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
I have plenty of legal weapons that will kill anything that moves too. The 'gun control' angle, in this election, is just another 'fear tactic'. It's a 'non factor' because neither candidate is for radical gun control. See ya Wednesday.....
It most definitely is an issue (not an angle). Undermining constitutional rights is one of the most significant threats to this nation.
LOL You are stretching way out there and scared like a sheep! Watch out for the fear tactics like what got us in Iraq. Don't let the fear tactics effect your logic. And Vikki, If your 'small business' can't operate on a taxible income, after all the bills are paid, of $250K a year, then you might as well hang it up. Because if you are clearing less than that you will not be effected by the proposed new tax laws.
well said vikki.i will never give up my 2nd amendment rights nor have them infringed on in any way.lead ammo,there is not that much used to make a huge inpact on the invironment.i cast my own bullets for target practice and they are made of lead.does that mean i will be a criminal for casting my own bullets?
well said vikki.i will never give up my 2nd amendment rights nor have them infringed on in any way.lead ammo,there is not that much used to make a huge inpact on the invironment.i cast my own bullets for target practice and they are made of lead.does that mean i will be a criminal for casting my own bullets?
It's stupid to cast bullets for HUNTING out of lead, period(or use lead shot). We've known that since the 80's! It was a no brainer then and it's old news now.
It most definitely is an issue (not an angle). Undermining constitutional rights is one of the most significant threats to this nation.
LOL You are stretching way out there and scared like a sheep! Watch out for the fear tactics like what got us in Iraq. Don't let the fear tactics effect your logic. And Vikki, If your 'small business' can't operate on a taxible income, after all the bills are paid, of $250K a year, then you might as well hang it up. Because if you are clearing less than that you will not be effected by the proposed new tax laws.
If my small business brought me an AGI of $250,000 I would be happy. It doesn't. That's why I have two other businesses. To say that I will not be affected is not accurate. If my customers are affected, so am I. And right now they are all hurting due to the auto industry situation.
I suppose I'd be more agreeable to discussion of higher taxes in good years if I was likewise credited for bad years. If we run in the red or minimally profitable for 5 years and then have one good year, we are heavily penalized that one good year, and can't break even.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
It most definitely is an issue (not an angle). Undermining constitutional rights is one of the most significant threats to this nation.
LOL You are stretching way out there and scared like a sheep! Watch out for the fear tactics like what got us in Iraq. Don't let the fear tactics effect your logic. And Vikki, If your 'small business' can't operate on a taxible income, after all the bills are paid, of $250K a year, then you might as well hang it up. Because if you are clearing less than that you will not be effected by the proposed new tax laws.
If my small business brought me an AGI of $250,000 I would be happy. It doesn't. That's why I have two other businesses. To say that I will not be affected is not accurate. If my customers are affected, so am I. And right now they are all hurting due to the auto industry situation.
I suppose I'd be more agreeable to discussion of higher taxes in good years if I was likewise credited for bad years. If we run in the red or minimally profitable for 5 years and then have one good year, we are heavily penalized that one good year, and can't break even.
QUOTE: If my customers are affected, so am I You have made a great argument for 'Trickle Down Economics' that we have been waiting to see if it works for 8 years now. Newsflash; It doesn't work!
well said vikki.i will never give up my 2nd amendment rights nor have them infringed on in any way.lead ammo,there is not that much used to make a huge inpact on the invironment.i cast my own bullets for target practice and they are made of lead.does that mean i will be a criminal for casting my own bullets?
It's stupid to cast bullets for HUNTING out of lead, period(or use lead shot). We've known that since the 80's! It was a no brainer then and it's old news now.
if that is common sense;why do we need a law for it?you should move to a country that has it's government telling it's people how to live,jim,i hate to say it but you are a disgruntled ex general motors employee and you seem to be a disgruntled u.s citizen.maybe you should try moving to a communist or socialist country where you may be a little happier.i am shur we all would miss you around here but you(lmao)need to find happiness
You have it wrong...our crisis came when we had a booming business, 6 employees, production facility...then came the late '90s...October 27, 1997. We tried to ride it out, leveraged everything we owned to try to keep it going, and pay the wages of 6 employees without commensurate sales, and we are still paying for it now. If we had immediately ditched our employees we'd have been fine, but that's not the right thing to do. Clintonomics...
We downsized, and unless things stabilize we will not expand. The economy is far too flaky to invest in growing a business.
Jim, what are your bullets cast from?
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
In all actuality, special interests runs the government and really does not matter who the puppet is for a figure, democrat or republican. The original intent of the republic was to eliminate one sided power and to balance the power between ideals. This will never happen with the influence of special interest money.
Absolutely true. The entire lobbyist/funding/contribution cycle has to be broken. I stated that early on in this thread. The adage to "rout the bums" or start with all new elected officials leaves fresh fodder for the well entrenched, no term limit lobbyists to work over.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
Why is it when someone tells the ugly truth about someone its called "fear tactics"? The truth is the truth. BTW, so-called trickle down economics started in the 80's with Ronald Reagan, which btw started the greatest economic boom this country has ever known. We were doing great economically until about two years ago when the dems took over the house and senate with control of the purse strings and regulations control. Its so asinine for people to want to punish people for earning their wealth. Class warfare is favorite tool of the libs. What on earth is fair about making some people pay more than others? How about everyone paying exactly the same percentage? That is the only way to be truly fair. We don't need welfare or socialism.
Issues I see with Obama are many, but claims he is anti-American are founded.
1. Obama took the American flag off the tail of his campaign jet and replaced it with his own logo. No presidential candidate has ever removed the American flag from their campaign jet.
2. Obama refuses to wear the little American flag pin that all American politicians wear.
3. Obama refuses to hold his hand over his heart during the playing of our National Anthem.
4. Michelle Obama stated she was never proud of her country until her husband was locked in as the Democratic candidate.
5. Obama stated he would bomb northern Pakistan (our friends) to get Osama Bin Laden. By comparison, if Great Britain found that their #1 most wanted terrosist was hiding in Indianapolis Indiana, is it ok for Britain to bomb Indianapolis to get their man?
6. He was friends with several anti-American terrorists (listed previously), some of which are extremely disturbing.
7. His church is racist and anti-American, yet Obama claims he didn't learn anything from them, even after attending that church every Sunday for the past 20 years.
You know, 15 years ago, a person with these traits was called a flag burner, anti-American, and had the potential for instigating domestic terrorism. It's hard to believe this guy will be our President. Times have sure changed.
Here's 13 minutes of video that may sway those of you that are fanatical Obama supporters.
Illinois has sky high taxes, the most corrupt politicians in the country (after their term, they end up in jail), and Chicago has the highest murder rate in America. Mayor Daly (Chicago), our Governor (Blagojevich, who has a 13% approval rating), and Senator Obama are all radical Liberals, and our state has always been a blue state.
This is what our country is in for. Don't say we didn't warn you.
Wow, you dont attend this site for a day (went to Paul Riss for amonster garage)and see what you miss... let me put a few notes in here 1) I`m sooo sick of all political phone calls, tv ads etc...I`ll be happy wednesday ,because its all over! 2) Jim (Fbody) said Obama is a conservative Democrat....thats SOOO far from the truth..we cant even begin to discuss it , he is THE MOST left in the left of the democratic party...meaning ,he is a socialist... believe me , I can pick him out...lived that same stuff in Sweden under Olof Palme...(check and see what happened to him in 1986, and not until 3 years ago Sweden recovered) 3) 50% +- of the country is really beng fooled ,either the people believing Obama is not a socialist, OR the rest of us...only time will tell...and I`m afraid I dont have 25-30 years to dig back out if I`m right! not any scare tactics, just experience.... 4) small businnes will suffer some from Obamas tax situation, but it wont hurt them so much ,because they will pass on their costs...so the people PAYING the tax increase for small business are ALL of US, as we buy things, hire services.. I work for a small businness, we are home builders, a very large small business,,,no 23 home builder in the country...when our taxes go up, we have three choices, increase the price of our homes, lay off people or just have less profits...less profits in a very tight economic situation, wiil usually mean tighten your belt...= lay off people plus decreases in cost..lay offs the most common... so the 3rd is most likely similar to the no 2 choice. the no 1 choice , means higher costs for buyers
and people have complained about jobs going overseas...in this situation ,even more would ,every small bus. , that can outsource stuff overseas ,will = more job losses here, = more money to be paid out by others with jobs, = higher taxes for 'welfare'.
other small bus. will react the same way...my side business, drafting of hoomes or additions and remodels...with higher tax for me , I have two choices, do them , add the tax in = higher costs to my customers, or dont do them... many might decide no to do the work , what does that mean? when many dont do the work , a lower GNP...the whole country produces less...= less taxes come in...
in times like these ,you dont raise taxes, you reduce them...look at this scanario...just look at what Sweden di in the 70`s ...to 'help' workers we increased overtime pay to 200% vs our overtime here at 150%...with a high tax rate we had in Sweden , 50% and UP...people asked to do overtime got caught up in a higher tax bracket...would you want to work over time and get $2.50 out of every $10 you made?? is that an incentive? NO....so ,they didnt want to work overtime...but many had to , job deadlines etc req`d it... SO, we got time off instead = untaxed! great , right? You work 2 days OT , get 4 days off...sounds great...
but when many in the whole country do this , can you figure out what happens to the GNP?? and the total tax income? it goes down....what the result? gov`t raise the taxes to recoup....an evil circle...
do the opposite, lets say we pay 25% tax here, even raise the taxes as Obama says...IF SO, lets at least reduce OT taxes...you work OT, pay 1/2 your normal tax rate!! incentive?? you bet..many would work ot, for less taxes...what happens to GNP? it goes up...the whole counry produces more ,and when it des, the govt can get more taxes ,even at a lesser rate!
you need 'carrots' , not sticks....higher taxes are sticks...higher tax is not a reward for job well done..
is not that hard! but its un-socialstick...and wont happen w Obama.....
free stuff isnt free, its paid for...'tax the rich' will come back around to bite you...those people own the companies that make the products this country sells....if they pay more, so will you...
thinking that tax the rich will help you is like going out to lunch with your lawyer...he suggests going out ,you say thank you, ...he pays for it, you think you had a great free lunch...following week you get the bill, not for the $20 worth of food you ate, but for the $100/hr his charge is , since he happened to discuss some legal matter of yours with you....LOL
anyway . McCain wouldnt be my perfect or preferred candidate, but with the choices as they are , I will not do a blunder as I did with Perot and vote 3rd candidate...I will not vote Obama...its going to have to be the 'anti Obama vote' going with McCain...not because of Obama being black, or that there are some questions ,even by Democrats (Berg) about his eliglibility, but because of his very left wing ideas, his left wing studies...
I`m off my soap box.
Oh ,yes, one more thing!
I really appreciate the 'tone' of the discussion here...not like at PY, where most of this by now would be name calling! You guys here are adults!
thinking that tax the rich will help you is like going out to lunch with your lawyer...he suggests going out ,you say thank you, ...he pays for it, you think you had a great free lunch...following week you get the bill, not for the $20 worth of food you ate, but for the $100/hr his charge is , since he happened to discuss some legal matter of yours with you....LOL
I love it! When I meet with my lawyer, we go to the diner or the coffee shop across from the courthouse, and I pay. It's understood there is no consultation fee as he is not obligated to be there. And of course we talk both business and pleasure.
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
when the conservatives in Sweden first came to power for a short time...(in the 90s??, then lost again , then regained the power...after the socialists had been in power over 40 years) the socialists said :" Oh ,its easy for you guys now, you come to a set table"
the conservatives answer wa: "yes ,the table was set, but also the dinner was eaten ,its was just the bill to pay that was left on the table!"