I have the chance to pick up both or either of these engines, what do you guys think? 1)Running 400 out of '78 Bonneville. $200 including TH400 tranny 2)'72 or '73 455 builder, needs new rods but is pretty complete, recent rebuild before rods twisted. $100 (both are from the same guy) I recently read in Jim Hand's book that post '76 400's have thinner cylinder walls and are not really desirable, so now I'm torn between the two engines. Also I wonder if there is a possibility to use the crank and/or rods off the 400 on the 455, so I don't have to shell out $800 for new aftermarket rods. I really would like the original 350 safe on an engine stand. Thanks, Dave
Just remember that late '70's 400 is going to be a low compression slug with the original heads!
2012 Mustang Boss 302 #1918, Competition Orange. FGF replacement 2006 Mustang V6 Pony, Vista Blue. Factory ordered. 2019 BMW X3 (Titled to the wife, but I'm always driving it for her. So I'm claiming it) Old projects, gone but not forgotten: 1967 FB 400, original CA car. After 22 years of work, trashed by the guy who was supposed to paint it. I had to sell it. 1980 Turbo Trans Am 1970 Mustang fastback, 351C 4Bbl, auto 1988 Mustang GT, 5 speed 1983 F-150 4x4, built 302 1994 Chevy K2500 HD 4x4, 454 TBI
By the way, it is my understanding that the rods ARE interchangeable....someone correct me if I'm wrong!
The rids twisted? No damage to the crank? I say build the 455....but I'm kinda biased.
I'm sure you've heard the saying....."there's no replacement for displacement". Believe me there's not! I went from a REAL healthy Chevy 350 to a healthy 455 and the difference is like night and day.
I think I like sixstarved's idea the best, and actually that was what I was planning to do. I already considered the camshaft and head issue regarding the 400. The 455 currently has #15 heads on it (could be either '69 or '70 heads, I haven't checked the date code yet because it's in my friend's garage). Either way, the #15 heads which are recently out of a machine shop would probably be decent on the 400, but I need to buy a cam. What apparently happened with the 455 was that my friend's friend rebuilt it but re-used the stock rods, which were inferior metal. He built it pretty stout and at least one of the rods twisted, possibly breaking the crank as well. I think either way I'll get the 400 and 400 tranny, and the 455 also. If it ends up I am happy with the 400, I will post the 455 for sale (though I'm almost sure I will want to keep it!)
I knew you were going to say that, Terry! I'm just afraid something might happen to my original engine, and would rather have it tucked away safely with it's lifelong partner, the transmission