LOL> While cleaning out my rear end, checking all the bearings and gears and changing fluids, I noticed someone has put 2.73 gears in my rear end. There should have been 3.36 gears in my ZM axle.
Is this a big difference in ratio and how will it effect the performance?
It will surely give you better gas mileage and run better on the highway.
But you won't be as quick off the line.
I had about five different comments about the heading of this thread, but decided to just be quiet.
I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not sure. I feel like I am diagonally parked in a parallel universe. 1968 400 convertible (Scarlet) 1976 T/A - 455 LE (No Burt) 1976 T/A New baby, starting full restoration. 1968 350 - 4 speed 'vert - 400 clone (the Beast!) 1968 350 convertible - Wife's car now- 400 clone (Aleutian Blue) (Blue Angel) 2008 Durango - DD 2008 GXP - New one from NH is AWESOME! 2017 Durango Citadel - Modern is nice! HEMI is amazing! 1998 Silverado Z71 - Father-daughter project 1968 400 coupe - R/A clone (Blue Pearl) (sold) 1967 326 convertible - Sold 1980 T/A SE Bandit - Sold
2.73 are great highway gears. Not very good for low end punch Not recommended for 4 speeds as you will probably be slipping your clutch in 1st more. I had 2.73 in my stock coupe /w 350 2 bbl and 2 sp PG. Could not spin my tires unless sand on the street !
IMHO
Engine Test Stand Playlist: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLwoxyUwptUcdqEb-o2ArqyiUaHW0G_C88 restoring my 1968 Firebird 400 HO convertible (Firedawg) 1965 Pontiac Catalina Safari Wagon 389 TriPower (Catwagon) 1999 JD AWS LX Lawn tractor 17hp (my daily driver) 2006 Sequoia 2017 Murano (wife's car) 202? Electric car 203? 68 Firebird /w electric engine 2007 Bayliner 175 runabout /w 3.0L Mercuiser__________________________________________________________
I have an almost brand new set of 3.70 gears out of my 400 coupe. I swapped them out for a set of 3.08's when I had my rearend rebuilt. I think they had less than 500 miles on them.
If interested, let me know.
I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not sure. I feel like I am diagonally parked in a parallel universe. 1968 400 convertible (Scarlet) 1976 T/A - 455 LE (No Burt) 1976 T/A New baby, starting full restoration. 1968 350 - 4 speed 'vert - 400 clone (the Beast!) 1968 350 convertible - Wife's car now- 400 clone (Aleutian Blue) (Blue Angel) 2008 Durango - DD 2008 GXP - New one from NH is AWESOME! 2017 Durango Citadel - Modern is nice! HEMI is amazing! 1998 Silverado Z71 - Father-daughter project 1968 400 coupe - R/A clone (Blue Pearl) (sold) 1967 326 convertible - Sold 1980 T/A SE Bandit - Sold
Not mentioned yet was checking the speedo gear in the transmission to see if it was also changed to match. If not, your speedo accuracy will be way off.
2012 Mustang Boss 302 #1918, Competition Orange. FGF replacement 2006 Mustang V6 Pony, Vista Blue. Factory ordered. 2019 BMW X3 (Titled to the wife, but I'm always driving it for her. So I'm claiming it) Old projects, gone but not forgotten: 1967 FB 400, original CA car. After 22 years of work, trashed by the guy who was supposed to paint it. I had to sell it. 1980 Turbo Trans Am 1970 Mustang fastback, 351C 4Bbl, auto 1988 Mustang GT, 5 speed 1983 F-150 4x4, built 302 1994 Chevy K2500 HD 4x4, 454 TBI
I`m not going to comment on what I thought,.... but re the rear end of the car...I have 2.56 rear gears, better for gas mileage.....and highway RPMs,...and I get pretty quick starts...but IF you are going to RACE the car ,yes get the other gears back...BUT I can just tell you that if you drive 10 miles or more, you will get there as fast as the others...I usually get there BEFORE the others , no matter my 2.56 gears! 'some' of them get to a 50 yd line before I do, but we usually drive further than that...lol
If you are rebuilding an HO and are being so specific with your restoration, the change to the original 3.36 gearing is a no brainer.
Most HO's came with 3.55 gearing for manuals and 3.36 for autos.
Will it affect? You will NOT be happy with 2.73 gearing in your HO. 2.73 gears are a dog.
Had a 68 400 manual (numbers matching, engine rebuilt to spec) with 3.36 gearing and was awesome. If you plan on a lower compression engine with a hp decrease, go with a 3.08....but to each his own.
Si Vis Pacem Parabellum
1967 Starlight black PMD Engineering 400 Auto 1968 Alpine Blue 400 4 speed 1968 Verdoro Green 400 HO 4 speed 2013 1LE 2SS/RS Inferno Orange Camaro.
2:73 gears: Don't rev your engine at a stop light challenging the car next to you to a short race...LOL
But, you'll get better gas mileage and likely more comfort at highway speed...
maybe not against another Pontiac , but against most other cars your initial torque will out operform them at redlights
I would add Buicks to that short list.
1968 400 Coupe, verdoro green, black vinyl top, auto 1969 GTO Judge coupe, Carousel Red, manual 1971 Trans Am, cameo white, auto 1970 Buick Skylark Custom Convertible 350-4(driver), Fire Red, white top, auto 1972 Buick GS Stage 1, Royal Blue, black vinyl top, auto
Not sure your intended use after this car is done. Trailer queen? Gears don't matter. If you actually intend to do any substantial "fun" driving at all I can promise that you are going to HATE 2.73 gears behind a 400 HO 4 speed. That is a drastic mismatch that will have truly dismal and inconsistent holeshot from a standing start unless you consistently and completely SMOKE your clutch every time you take off.
Agree you might as well drive it first and get an idea of what you might want. But starting thinking right now, because you will absolutely want different gears in this car unless you are truly gonna granny-drive it.
LOL, I dont "granny drive" mine for sure...and I love it with 2.56 gears....smoking tires and all...its not just the power of the engine when you drive ,you also need to know "how to"....unless qtr mile racing...it really doesnt matter much....to "get thru' traffic , driving right....of course just my humble opinion...but IF you are going to drive it 'hard' be sure to add the chin spoiler (Camaro part!) to keep the front wheels on the ground....I did add it , as it get really swayee after 80 mph without it...
Thought I would update this thread.... The 2.73 gears are a dog on takeoff with the M20 Muncie. We live in the mountains and pulling off on a hill was really hard on the clutch.
I tracked down a date correct ZM axle with the correct 3.36 posi earlier this year. It was really clean and looked like the axle bearings had been replaced but I media blasted, painted and changed the fluids. I was finally ready for a axle swap.
This past Sunday I swapped them and it went pretty easy. Since the new rear axle has the correct 3R pinion yoke, I had to change the universal joint back from the 1310 -3R combo joint. The swap was straight forward. I jacked it up on stands. Dropped the driveshaft. Disconnected emergency brake cables, disconnect brake line at piston and removed top holding bracket from top of cover, unbolted lower shock bolt, unbolted the u bolts and t bolts from lower shock mount to axle, unbolted front spring cup and lowered front of spring to ground and slid out axle.
After putting the new axle in in reverse order, I changed over the brake components to new axle.
I have not test drove it yet and I hope to finish up some small items like add friction modifier additive, torque some bolts and bleed the brakes. I then hope to test it out this weekend. I am hoping to see a big difference in take off as well as my speedometer calibrated correctly.
My plans now is to try out the 3.36 and see how I like it. Then have my original rear end completely rebuilt with a new posi carrier, bearings and either 3.55 or 3.36 depending how these go.
The original 3:36 ratio for your car would be in the nice "happy medium" in gear ratio. Not the best on mileage, but certainly better than feeling like your car has no pep. My car has a 3:55 axle, you can definitely feel it has some gear behind it.
I tested out the 3.36 gears and it is like night to day difference. Pulling out is a lot better and you can easily light up the tires. I am so pleased with the change. My speedometer is now correct too. Awesome.
I just can't belive someone would change out these gears to 2.73 and leave it that way. Unbelievable.
I found a Pontiac 68 4 pinion posi carrier with 3.36 gears last month. I had it shipped to J D Race and Restoration - Jim Mitschke to have it rebuild. I also shipped him my original rear axle so he can install the posi and set up the 3.36 gears. He installed all new bearings. The posi and rear is all with in spec and will be ready to hit the road soon.
Jim made it so easy to ship the rear axle to him and the cost for all the service and the shipping was very reasonable.
I found a Pontiac 68 4 pinion posi carrier with 3.36 gears last month. I had it shipped to J D Race and Restoration - Jim Mitschke to have it rebuild. I also shipped him my original rear axle so he can install the posi and set up the 3.36 gears. He installed all new bearings. The posi and rear is all with in spec and will be ready to hit the road soon.
Jim made it so easy to ship the rear axle to him and the cost for all the service and the shipping was very reasonable
Did you do all that to have an extra set up? Jim is good people and does very good work and is very resonable. He put together an 8.5 rearend for me with eaton posi and 3:73 gearing... and I love it. Good luck on it!
I will put this original one back in the car and sale the extra one I have. There is several people looking for a 68 nodular rear axle. So I might as well make some one happy.
I got the rear axle back from Jim a couple weeks ago. I just installed it and went for a little test ride. It sure rode nice. No vibrations, noises, roaring. Seems to even feel smoother at 75 then it did before.
Jim did a great job on the setup. I give him a A++