|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 9
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 9 |
What is the largest recommended tire and rim size on a stock 1967 firebird? Base Model convertible.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534 |
What diameter are you planning to run?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14
Premium Member
|
|
Premium Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14 |
Not a lot of room in the front wheel wells for 67/68
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 9
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 9 |
I was planning on going with a 16 or 17". I'm looking for a pro-touring look.
Last edited by Scott67; 02/28/22 07:07 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14
Premium Member
|
|
Premium Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14 |
I’m a fan of 14 or 15 max. I’ve got 14’s on there now like god intended. 
Last edited by Bob S.; 02/28/22 09:39 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534 |
Performance tire sizes in 16s have pretty much dried up over the years . I wouldn't even bother.
A lot of wheels cast wheels offered, don't have the optimal offset (+6 to +8mm) for our cars. You also have to take into account the alignment specs, type of front brakes (discs move the track width out), camber gain, and ride height.
Safe would be 225/50R17 on 17x8s front and 245/45R17 on 17x9 rear if the offset is not less than 0mm. But if you can get the +6 to +8mm offset, you should be able to run 235/45R17 and 255/45R17.
P.S. Don't try to run any tire < 25.5" O.D. It's way too short and looks awkward no matter how low you adjust the ride height - seen it in person.
Last edited by FirebirdMike; 03/01/22 08:55 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 9
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 9 |
thanks Mike this is a helpful starting point.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 3
New Member
|
|
New Member
Joined: Jan 2022
Posts: 3 |
I recently bought a 67 with 18 x 9's (235/40's) on front and 20 x 10's (255/30's) rear. The fronts rub on full lock and I have to go slow while turning into my driveway or the chrome wheel arch surround get rubbed. Hope that helps
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534 |
I recently bought a 67 with 18 x 9's (235/40's) on front and 20 x 10's (255/30's) rear. The fronts rub on full lock and I have to go slow while turning into my driveway or the chrome wheel arch surround get rubbed. Hope that helps More information would be required. What offset (or backspacing) do they have? Is the vehicle stock height or lowered? Using a factory frame or aftermarket? Assuming you have disc brakes? I'm also thinking you're stating the overall width of the wheels not the inside bead to bead. Bead to bead is how wheel and tire manufacturers both define the width. Overall wheel width is about 1" wider. A 235 on an advertised 18x9 (10" overall width) would be very stretched (as would a 255 on an 18x10). Check your static alignment camber. If it's positive, not only does that play a factor in tire fitment, but handling as well. If you can dial in 1/2 degree negative camber it may help avoid the rubbing and make a huge difference in the handling. If you were planning to rebuild the suspension, another thing that can help is using Proforged 1/2" taller upper ball joints. This allows the tire to camber in more at the top as the suspension compresses. This is mainly done to improve handling, but a side-benefit would be additional clearance.
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics35,534
Posts298,850
Members8,861
| |
Most Online19,810 Feb 1st, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
1,658
guests, and
127
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|