I honestly have no clue how these compare and am looking for some insight. My engine came with my project car already assembled. It is a 455, .030 over with Edelbrock heads that have been ported.
I'm REALLY suprised the numbers on those edelbrocks aren't better! Especially if they were ported!
I ported a set of 6X-4 heads in my garage and go retty close to those numbers....actually better across the board on the exhaust numbers!
That is also a pretty big difference from port to port!
Mine flowed 258 int and 232 exhaust at .550 lift and was still climbing, but I didn't have them flow them above .550....wish I had! I had 2 chambers flowed and they were less than 3 cfm difference from 1 to the other.
Agreed the variance between the two runner sets seems a bit high.
Be careful when comparing flow rates from different sources. You need to ensure the same correction factors (temperature, humidity, etc.) and pressure were used. Also, sometimes a lead in radius is used so the flow is not hitting a a sharp edge. And finally, sometimes a head is flowed at one pressure and then "correct" to another which loses accuracy as well.
I found my flow numbers....my memory was close, but not exact.
Port I/E .200 .300 .400 .500 .600 1 I 147.5 193.2 233.2 248.0 258.5 1 E 121.0 165.4 197.0 220.7 232.4 3 I 147.2 194.2 234.5 247.2 256.2 3 E 119.6 163.8 197.1 222.2 233.6
They were slowed @ 28 inches of H2O and the intake port entries were smoothed with clay. The intake and gasket is port matched and I made sure everything lined up perfectly during installation.