Wow that would be great. Think you would treat it like a rental car???????????????
That's the kicker. I imagine some would and would drive the hell out of it.
And I think it would be a worse idea to lease it especially if you took care of it. I imagine the dealership wouldn't factor in the appreciation in collectible value when the lessee returns it.
To me, leasing makes sense if you consider your car a utility. This here would be like renting a painting.
Mark
68 Firebird 350 auto (sold) 70 Trans Am RAIII 400 4-speed (sold) 2011 Challenger SRT8 IE392 6-speed (sold) 2017 Challenger Hellcat 1966 Dodge Coronet 440
If you think about it, it's not a bad investment for the leasing company. They buy a car, as it's a "luxury" type of car they collect a significant down payment and big monthly payments. When the lease is up, they clean it up and touch it up, and end up with a car that has not depreciated significantly in value.
I am sure that if it was for lease, the contract would specify that any collision or mechanical repair would have to be done by their approved shop.
Hmmm, Dream Cruise rentals? Forget the summer cabin, rent or lease a summer car?
Vikki 1969 Goldenrod Yellow / black 400 convertible numbers matching
It's close enough to me too Its been on there awhile.Are you sure it can be leased? I realize they lease cars but they also sell them too. I wonder if that was a trade in on something that was in their inventory
David
http://FirstGenFirebird.org/show/closeup.mv?CarID=571 If i don't get this car back on the road soon i'm gonna go postal! On a quest for FGF knowledge 1968 Pontiac Firebird Convertible 1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass "S" Convertible *Sold*
It would be weird driving someone elses first gen for anything more than a test drive. All the fun for me is driving my car that I restored. I would rather drive a Viper if it wasn't a car I re-created. Rent-a-wreck has been around for a while.....