|
|
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4 |
can this be a direct bolt in ?
johnny parks
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,473
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,473 |
the pontiac is different internally, but should bolt up to the mounts and driveshaft if both rears are original.
scott / 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 17
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 17 |
I think the connection to the driveshaft may require some modification. I have a 67 Camaro rearend in my 'bird, and I think I had to fool with the yoke or u-joint during the install years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 854 Likes: 3
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 854 Likes: 3 |
jed your right the u-joint is different.
johnny the firebird u-joint is bigger than the camaro. they make a u-joint that will adapt the camaro drive shaft to the firebird rear end or you could find a firebird driveshaft for the same trans you have and put it in. everything else will be the same, brake shoes, drums, wheel mounting, one thing to watch for is to make sure you have the same type of springs (ie) multi or mono leaf. you can install a mono leaf rearend on multi leaf springs with no problems. if you go the other way the rearend may be a little loose and move around.
Wade
Wade
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics35,546
Posts298,900
Members8,865
| |
Most Online19,810 Feb 1st, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
202
guests, and
23
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|