|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16 |
I have a set of 6x 4 castings (i believe they're 1977) that I'm dropping at my machine shop today to get cleaned and checked for cracks. I want to run these on my 455 and use the stock cast iron intake that's on the car now (with 47 heads). I can't remember the exact date, but the intake is around a 68 - 69 4 barrel cast iron intake. Is this a direct bolt on with the 6x heads, or is there some nonsense I have to deal with on the exhaust crossover -- seems like I read this somewhere. Thanks! -paul
--------------------------------------------------------------- 68 Firebird Convertible / 400 clone / Paladium Silver --------------------------------------------------------------- 69 Chevelle SS / 496 / Tunnel Ram / 11.28 @ 122 --------------------------------------------------------------- http://s195.photobucket.com/albums/z160/unclejack_bucket/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 16 |
OK, I just read the Jim Hand article on this and it sounds like a leaky spank with the stainless and silicone. I don't mind the effort, but I'm concerned about the results. Is there a better solution to this, like running an Edelbrock Performer or something like that?
If any of you guys have done the ho-made block off thing, let me know how well it works. Thanks! --paul.
--------------------------------------------------------------- 68 Firebird Convertible / 400 clone / Paladium Silver --------------------------------------------------------------- 69 Chevelle SS / 496 / Tunnel Ram / 11.28 @ 122 --------------------------------------------------------------- http://s195.photobucket.com/albums/z160/unclejack_bucket/
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,421
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,421 |
I'd go with the Performer. Not only will the performer run better, it'll drop a bunch of wt over the iron intake. The cross over fix is ok I hear but personally never done it.
Wanting a Custom fit in an off the rack world. I don't have time for a job, I just need the money.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108 |
I've never could get a performer to beat a 68-72 factory intake. Nearly drove me crazy do to the wieght factor. But the plenum and runners are smaller.
As far as early intake to later heads. Fill exhaust x-over unless you drive all winter. Not needed during summer months. And should be done if using hedders.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265
Valued Mentor
|
|
Valued Mentor
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265 |
The Performer is a better match for the 6x heads.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108 |
The Performer is a better match for the 6x heads. Thats what i had(78 TA/X7 400 w/6x-4's). Stock cam. A stock 68 and 70 intake ran better.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265
Valued Mentor
|
|
Valued Mentor
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265 |
The Performer is a better match for the 6x heads. Thats what i had(78 TA/X7 400 w/6x-4's). Stock cam. A stock 68 and 70 intake ran better. That is a matter of opinion.  The Performer is a better match with the gaskets.
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics35,546
Posts298,900
Members8,865
| |
Most Online19,810 Feb 1st, 2026
|
|
|
0 members (),
167
guests, and
26
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|