Not susprising. Thats now they stacked up back in the muscle car days. Although Ford and Dodge built some good look'n models, they never built a car that handled as well as GM. Of the 3, i like the looks of the Dodge best. But if i was gon'a spend that kind of $, it would be for handling and power.
That only bolsters the long awaited launch. I've been to three Chevy dealers, none of them will come off list for the '10 5th gen. I'm going to wait 'till the hype dies down, save some money and get some other long put off things done.
My dad ordered a 1993 Viper. When the car was finally delivered in 1994 the dealer did not inform him of its arrival and actually drove it in the snow and slush. When Dad got the call and went to the dealer to purchase the car he saw the dried up slop in the wheel wells. Then they moved on to the transaction. The dealer tried to jack up the price by $10k over the deal they had previously agreed to. Dad pointed out that they had a deal and, "Isn't my name on that car?" The dealer said, "Don't even try it. There's been precedent." Dad complained to the Cadillac Zone Manager since the Dodge Dealer was also the Cadillac dealer where he had purchased several cars. The Cadillac Zone Manager did something that made the dealer reconsider his position on the Dodge. The dealer called my dad to re-extend his original offer of sticker on the Viper. Dad told him to f#@k himself, and passed on the Viper. He bought his Caddy's elsewhere too.
there should be a firebird competing against those three. It just doesn't make sense. No wonder gm is having problems. they aren't making cars we want (minus the camaro).
