|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
...to clear my 255/60/15's that don't fit under the fenders. I am using air shocks to gain about 2" of height(60 to 70 lbs pressure). This is working fine but, I don't think this is the best way. I installed those bolt on "spring boosters" this weekend. They gave me about 1/2" and some stiffness, which I do not mind. The stiffer it is, the less I have to raise up the rear.
[img]http://members.aol.com:/gsv4041/rearbird[/img]
Main question: What is the drawback of using airshocks for this?
What is the alternative other than replacing the springs? I may want put stock rims back on in future.
Fire away!!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,986
Requiescat In Pace
|
|
Requiescat In Pace
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,986 |
that is why they put 14 inch tires and wheels from the factory.the danger with the air shocks when they develope a leak,you will sustain damage to your quarter panels and tires.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,923
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,923 |
Greg, Had a similar problem on my Challenger. I took my springs to a spring shop and had them re-arched for an extra 2 inches (MOL) of height.
Your other choice might be to replace the wheel with something with less backspace. Would bring them in under the fender better. (Re-arching would be cheaper!)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Lee, I like the Cragars and, I can't get any "deeper" than 4-1/4" back spacing. I'd need about 5". Thanks for the input.
"that is why they put 14 inch tires and wheels from the factory"
Birdman, I knew I'd get some comments to that affect.
Keep it coming!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,859
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,859 |
I bet Terry's house is covered in wall to wall shag carpeting and avacado green appliances Greg, Im surprised your having a problem with those tires. Mine snug up nice without a problem at all. 275 60R 15
http://firstgenfirebird.org/show/closeup.mv?CarID=646 ----------------------------------- Joe -----------------------------------     >> |^^^^^^^^^^^^^^'''''| || >> |...BEER TRUCK......| ||'|";, ___. >> |_..._..._______===|=||_|__|..., ] - >> "(@)'(@)""""""""''"**|(@)(@)******''(@)
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 9
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 9 |
I put a new spring pack and slightly longer shackle on the back of mine and it's got plenty of clearance. I have 275/50/15's on it which are 26x10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Joe Papa, you got photos? What is the backspacing on your rims?
Just checked your photo on the forum. I think the '69's are more forgiving than the '67-'68's regarding fat tires.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054 |
Maytbe you need to swap leafs with Nashville!??
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 55
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 55 |
I have the same brand and size tires on my 68 Convertable and use airshocks to get them not to rub. A temp fix at best.
I am using the air shocks until I replace the rear springs this summer. As far as I have reasearched, this is the safest most reliable way to get the larger tires to fit without rubbing or bottoming out.
As for the others who run this setup without problems, I guess their springs haven't sagged as much as ours pover the years.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 278 |
I wouldn't use air shocks for very long. too much force could rip the upper shock mount, and you will have to have it welded. it's not designed to hold the back end up, it's designed to just dampen the ride.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 323
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 323 |
you could use longer shackles to raise the rear
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
For those interested:
My brother gave me a pair of single leaves(springs)he removed from a Tahoe. They are quite a bit stouter than the individual leaves on the 'bird. I removed and replaced the second leaf from the bottom, keeping all others. This put my rear right where I wanted to be with no assist from the air-shocks. We'll see if she settles down over the next several miles. Can't beat the price!! And it was an easy project.
Also, while under the car, I noticed (duh!!) that the bottom leaf on the 'bird is a half length leaf, only projecting forward from the spring shackle. Is this correct?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Bump...
Anyone notice my question re the stock springs...?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,161 Likes: 51
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 6,161 Likes: 51 |
Greg, I replaced my factory leaf springs many years ago so I cannot remember what they looked like. But the replacements are symmetrical five leafs.
Jim '68 400HO Conv.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,241
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,241 |
I took a look last night- Greg, my #5 spring is also asymmetrical, just like yours: very short and thin, sticking out the front and not the back. All my springs are the originals.
400HO vert, 3 speed, 8-track, deluxe parchment/flambeau burgandy
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics35,546
Posts298,900
Members8,865
| |
Most Online19,810 Feb 1st, 2026
|
|
|
1 members (Jimc2002),
198
guests, and
33
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|