|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054 |
Not sure who didnt like me saying the Firebird was not a "muscle car" but a "Pony car", but I just ran into this...where it agrees with my statement... just fyi. The Pontiac Firebird was a pony car built by the Pontiac division of General Motors between 1967 and 2002.
The Firebird was introduced in the same year with its platform sharing cousin the Chevrolet Camaro. This coincided with the release of the Mercury Cougar, which shared its platform with another well-known pony car, the Ford Mustang.
The vehicles were, for the most part, powered by various V8 engines of different GM divisions. While primarily Pontiac-powered until 1977, Firebirds were built with several different engines from nearly every GM division until 1982 when all Pontiac motors were dropped in favor of corporate motors. and.... A muscle car is a high-performance automobile. The term principally refers to American, Australian and South African models and generally describes a 2-door rear wheel drive mid-size car with a large, powerful V8 engine and special trim, intended for maximum torque on the street or in drag racing competition. It is distinguished from sports cars, which were customarily and coincidentally considered smaller, two-seat cars, or GTs, two-seat or 2+2 cars intended for high-speed touring and possibly road racing. High-performance full-size or compact cars are arguably excluded from this category, as are the breed of compact sports coupes inspired by the Ford Mustang. Other factors used in defining classic muscle cars are their age and country of origin. A classic muscle car is usually but not necessarily made in the US or Australia between 1964 and 1975. Notably, the term "muscle car" did not enter common usage until after production of the cars had essentially ended. During their heyday, print media usually referred to this class of vehicle as "supercars". pony cars: [edit] Defining the class The Mustang provided the template for the new class of automobiles. Although it was based on the platform of the Falcon, it had a unique body (offered as a hardtop coupé and a convertible) with distinctive, "long hood, short deck" proportions. In basic form it was mechanically mundane, with a 170 cu. in. (2.8L) six-cylinder engine and three-speed manual transmission. It carried an attractive base price of $2,368, and had an extensive option list offering a range of V8 engines, Cruise-O-Matic automatic transmission or four-speed manual, radios, air conditioning, power steering, and other accessories. A V8 Mustang with all available options would cost about 60% more than a basic Six, which made it an extremely profitable model for Ford.
The requirements were therefore set:
Attractive, sporty styling Affordable base price Extensive options, including six-cylinder and V8 engines Aggressive, youth-oriented marketing and advertising. While most of the pony cars offered more powerful engines and performance packages, enough to qualify some as muscle cars, a substantial number were sold with six-cylinder engines or mundane, "cooking" V8s, with the high-performance models largely limited to drag racing, road racing, or racing homologation purposes.
Pony car competitors Despite the immediate success of the Mustang, many (including some within Ford) feared that the bubble would soon burst, and other manufacturers were relatively slow to respond. The first competitor was the Plymouth Barracuda, which actually went on sale on April 1, 1964, about two weeks before the Mustang. The Barracuda was not a direct response to the Mustang, which had not yet debuted (although Chrysler was certainly aware of the upcoming model), but a low-cost way to expand the sporty appeal of the Valiant. Chrysler's precarious financial situation meant that the Barracuda was compromised, with insufficient distinction from the Valiant and styling that drew mixed reactions; its sales were a fraction of the Mustang's. (Some mentioned that if the Barracuda was successful, the term for this class of automobile might have been "fish car," rather than "pony car.")[1] [2] [3] [4]
Initially, General Motors believed that the restyled 1965 Corvair would be an adequate challenger for the Mustang, but when it became clear that the Corvair itself was doomed, the more conventional Chevrolet Camaro was introduced, going on sale for the 1967 model year, at the time the Mustang was entering its second generation. They were presently joined by the Camaro-based Pontiac Firebird, the Mercury Cougar, and, in 1968, the AMC Javelin. Dodge joined the party belatedly with the 1970 Dodge Challenger, an enlarged version of the Barracuda.
Last edited by Bjorn Sefeldt; 10/26/07 12:01 PM. Reason: added pony cars
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265
Valued Mentor
|
|
Valued Mentor
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265 |
You are right(arguably!) High-performance full-size or compact cars are arguably excluded from this category, as are the breed of compact sports coupes inspired by the Ford Mustang.But then again, they only say the 'sports coupes' are excluded. Must be the verts are muscle cars! Source; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054 |
You are right(arguably!) High-performance full-size or compact cars are arguably excluded from this category, as are the breed of compact sports coupes inspired by the Ford Mustang.But then again, they only say the 'sports coupes' are excluded. Must be the verts are muscle cars! Source; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car of course , as usual on "both" accounts ( correct and arguably! lol) Vert is a muscle car..lol, maybe thats why I got my trophy last weekend!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 846
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 846 |
Well, it IS called HORSEpower... as long as Firebirds aren't called puny-cars, I really don't care..
-Lighter than mid-sized cars but with same engine. =extra muscle for my car.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054 |
Lighter than mid-sized cars but with same engine. =extra muscle for my car lots of times more "muscle" than a muscle car because of that situation...many GTO owners were upset with many of the hp vs weight Firebird versions....basically same engine with less weight...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14
Premium Member
|
|
Premium Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14 |
They also sold low HP 2bbl 400 GTO's.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130 |
Mine's a muscular pony car.
Say hello to my leetle friend..Presenting the "FIRETOAD" 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 437
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 437 |
redvert..too funny...would that be a gelding?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108 |
I'd be that guy. There are lots of facts for and against. Offical definition for a muscle car is; A big c.i. engine in a small body. The 64 gto is credited as the 1st. It's stated in online dictionaries as; A flashy car with a big engine, designed to look like a sports car. Tell me that's not a FB. I blame ford for the screw up. They coined the phrase "pony car" when the Mustang day viewed in 64. No large V8's were available in them then. A-body guys hate it when you argue this point. It means thier muscle car was not the quickest muscle car from the same manufacturer 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108 |
Forgot. They aways bring up the full frame vs unibody issue.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,263
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,263 |
Obviously those guys aren't well informed about Chrysler products!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130 |
redvert..too funny...would that be a gelding? I'd probably go with thoroughbred for now. 
Say hello to my leetle friend..Presenting the "FIRETOAD" 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054
Administrator
|
|
Administrator
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 20,054 |
Forgot. They aways bring up the full frame vs unibody issue.
I like these discussions...usually bring up several points I never heard before...and with each , you earn more as my step dad used to say : " a day you didnt learn something new ,was a wasted day" ! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130 |
I'm getting a raise?
Suh-Weet!
Say hello to my leetle friend..Presenting the "FIRETOAD" 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889 |
You are right(arguably!) High-performance full-size or compact cars are arguably excluded from this category, as are the breed of compact sports coupes inspired by the Ford Mustang.But then again, they only say the 'sports coupes' are excluded. Must be the verts are muscle cars! Source; http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muscle_car Hey, the Pony Car Mustang was a redesigned Falcon. So shouldn't they all be called Bird Cars. 
Tom '69 Firebird 400 4spd conv
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,139
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,139 |
My dad used to say that Pony-cars were "wanna-be" Mustangs. He owned three Mustangs over the years and a nice Cutlass.
So was a Cuda a Pony-car? A Challenger? That quote calls a Cougar a pony as well??
I say any coupe with over 300HP and over 181.5 inches in length (1965 Mustang length) is a Classic Muscle Hotrod, not a little cute pony!!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108 |
What about Chargers? They were midsize unibodies.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 174
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 174 |
Cudas and Cougars are indeed pony cars. I don't know enough about Chrysler products to say whether a Challenger is one.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,263
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,263 |
Poncho, that's why I brought up the Chrysler products in response to the frame vs unibody issue. All Mopars, whether designated as a muscle car (medium sized car with "full" size engine) or pony car (built to compete in the Mustang market), are unibody cars, so the people who cling to the "frame" idea are really grasping at straws to defend their cars. A better distinction might be a wheelbase of 110" or less.
Challengers are pony cars, 110" wheelbase, Cudas a little shorter at 108".
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14
Premium Member
|
|
Premium Member
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,248 Likes: 14 |
The term should be fish cars since the Cuda beat the Mustang to the dealers by several weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,615
Premium Member
|
|
Premium Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,615 |
Cougars are definitelt pony cars. Its the Mercury version of the Mustang.Pony car works for me. And, as stated above, its a "muscular ponycar".
I'm a hobbyist. Not a professional. Don't be hatin'!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,462
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,462 |
Firebirds: Pony on steroids 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,139
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 5,139 |
You guys are all bought out by a 40-year old bogus line. The term Pony was thought up by Ford geeks to create a class they thought they could control. Just like the horse itself.
Goobers and geeks allowed the phrase and the thought-process to gain ground and eventually become a market standard.
My 68 bird is not in the pony class or category, and it never was. Okay, I can see the Cougar being thrown in there, but not my monster Firebird.
I am not going down on this non-industry-standard bullcrap category, originated by Ford.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,108 |
I consider any small/midsize car with a large c.i. or HP engine a muscle car...period. Because thats what they were called before the wiennie magazine writers screwed everything up.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889 |
How about a muscular pony car?  BTW the Merc Cougar had a longer wheelbase than it's cousin. Just like the Cuda and Challenger. The first car I drove legally was a '67 Cougar. I'm not one for blue oval products, but that's one I would like to drive again.
Tom '69 Firebird 400 4spd conv
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265
Valued Mentor
|
|
Valued Mentor
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265 |
Pure American Muscle, thats what we got. With plenty of ponies.... Pony cars are those ones on a stick at the grocery store that you put a quarter in and let your kid ride on....
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130 |
Long hood, short trunk deck.
That was one of the criteria used by GM engineers in producing a follow up car to the mustang. Camaro came first, Firebird came second.
I only liked the fastback mustangs. The coupe never did anything for me. The F-Body had a natural slope to the rear window design and didn't require multiple hardtop designs to be sexy.
And the First Gen F-Body is one sexy b*tch.
Last edited by redvert68; 10/27/07 01:22 PM.
Say hello to my leetle friend..Presenting the "FIRETOAD" 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,615
Premium Member
|
|
Premium Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,615 |
Okay. Ford "invents" the Mustang. Its a phenominal hit. It is a pony car. GM introduces the F body to compete with the Mustang. Use some simple logic and decide what your Firebird was intended to be.
Certainly, the phrase or label was promoted by Ford. They INVENTED the class. They gave birth to it. They named it. And thank God they did. Otherwise we'd all be on the Mustang forum right now.
I'm a hobbyist. Not a professional. Don't be hatin'!
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,986
Requiescat In Pace
|
|
Requiescat In Pace
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 6,986 |
call it what you like,very few resemble what they were when they came out of the factory by now so what does it matter?most have been modified to the owners tastes.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265
Valued Mentor
|
|
Valued Mentor
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265 |
I think those pony cars at the grocery store are 50 cents to ride now aren't they? They used to be a dime! Now if they were to make a Firebird ride like that it would be a mechanical bull. YEE HAW!!! 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,719
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,719 |
This reminds me of a hotly debated topic over on PY lately.
Somebody's relatives pointed out that Ford started using the phrase "Super Duty" for their trucks WAY before Pontiac did and the Pontiac faithful had a really tough time swallowing that.
2012 Mustang Boss 302 #1918, Competition Orange. FGF replacement 2006 Mustang V6 Pony, Vista Blue. Factory ordered. 2019 BMW X3 (Titled to the wife, but I'm always driving it for her. So I'm claiming it) Old projects, gone but not forgotten: 1967 FB 400, original CA car. After 22 years of work, trashed by the guy who was supposed to paint it. I had to sell it. 1980 Turbo Trans Am 1970 Mustang fastback, 351C 4Bbl, auto 1988 Mustang GT, 5 speed 1983 F-150 4x4, built 302 1994 Chevy K2500 HD 4x4, 454 TBI
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130 |
Pontiac didn't have the first GTO either.
Say hello to my leetle friend..Presenting the "FIRETOAD" 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265
Valued Mentor
|
|
Valued Mentor
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265 |
This reminds me of a hotly debated topic over on PY lately.
Somebody's relatives pointed out that Ford started using the phrase "Super Duty" for their trucks WAY before Pontiac did and the Pontiac faithful had a really tough time swallowing that. Pontiac started SD in 61, when did Ford?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,719
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,719 |
Mid '50's from what I read at PY for the really large commercial type trucks. And to add insult to injury, the 1st Pontiac SD racers used the hood scoops inprinted with "Super Duty" taken from scrapped Ford trucks.
2012 Mustang Boss 302 #1918, Competition Orange. FGF replacement 2006 Mustang V6 Pony, Vista Blue. Factory ordered. 2019 BMW X3 (Titled to the wife, but I'm always driving it for her. So I'm claiming it) Old projects, gone but not forgotten: 1967 FB 400, original CA car. After 22 years of work, trashed by the guy who was supposed to paint it. I had to sell it. 1980 Turbo Trans Am 1970 Mustang fastback, 351C 4Bbl, auto 1988 Mustang GT, 5 speed 1983 F-150 4x4, built 302 1994 Chevy K2500 HD 4x4, 454 TBI
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,719
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,719 |
Here's the PY thread on "Super Duty": PY Thread
2012 Mustang Boss 302 #1918, Competition Orange. FGF replacement 2006 Mustang V6 Pony, Vista Blue. Factory ordered. 2019 BMW X3 (Titled to the wife, but I'm always driving it for her. So I'm claiming it) Old projects, gone but not forgotten: 1967 FB 400, original CA car. After 22 years of work, trashed by the guy who was supposed to paint it. I had to sell it. 1980 Turbo Trans Am 1970 Mustang fastback, 351C 4Bbl, auto 1988 Mustang GT, 5 speed 1983 F-150 4x4, built 302 1994 Chevy K2500 HD 4x4, 454 TBI
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130 |
I need an emblem that says SUPER DIRTY right about now. My Bird hasn't bathed in years.. 
Say hello to my leetle friend..Presenting the "FIRETOAD" 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 846
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 846 |
When I got my Firebird, some guy said: -Why does he want that car anyway?? -It's not even a musclecar...
-My reply was simple: Call it what you want, but my car will outbrake, outrun, do 0-60, 0-100, 1/8, 1/4 mile, faster than your car.
-Mind you he had a nice 72 charger (440-4), but it had stock heads, cam, drivetrain, only new carburator. (and a big stereo)
Same guy bought a 600 cfm edelbrock carb from me for THAT car. -telling me that it would be sufficient for his musclecar (he claimed it had 500 hp)..
Only goes to tell that whatever you call any car, if it's easy on the eyes, and fast as a mother it's proberbly a nice, cool car. Regardless of musclecar, pony car, sports car, or whatever.
-I'd call the high performance cars, -simply (as they used to be called)
'Super cars'.
Last edited by Claus Moeller; 10/27/07 02:48 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265
Valued Mentor
|
|
Valued Mentor
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 14,265 |
Ut OH!!! Now you've went and done it Claus. Stepped on the 'Super Car' name. Here we go into a semantics debate over what a 'Super Car' is. Those, notoriuosly, are cars like the COPO's, Yenkos, Baldwin Motion, Royal Bobcat  ect.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 130 |
I dunno..Clausie's car looks pretty freakin' Super to me.
Say hello to my leetle friend..Presenting the "FIRETOAD" 
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics35,534
Posts298,850
Members8,862
| |
Most Online19,810 Feb 1st, 2026
|
|
|
1 members (Dr. Drivability),
1,839
guests, and
212
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|