|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439 |
I want to increase the overall diameter of my tires by about 2" in order to drop my highway rpms.
I'm running BFG P215/70SR 14 that I measure 25" o/a diameter. The BFG site says these are 25.9". I'm not sure why there's a .9" difference in measurements (the tires are still in excellent condition, so they're not worn)
Should I go with a taller 14" tire? The tallest I can see is a 225/70R14 at 26.5" Only 0.6" taller than mine if I go by the BFG website. But by my measurements, they would be 1.5" taller and may work.
Am I nuts trying to get the taller tire or should I just go ahead and switch to 15"s?
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,341
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,341 |
I just went to 15s (covered in another topic). I went with BFG 225/70/15 and I am very happy with the look, ride, feel etc. I think they fill out the wheel openings nicely. Just a note, the right front does rub just a bit if wheel is cut all the way to the right. The car rides much nicer IMO with the 15s. As you can see in the pic below I went black wall out and no trim rings (for now)... 
Last edited by 68 Firebird400; 02/02/09 09:01 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 65
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 65 |
Same experience for me with the 15's. Nice overall and a little rub on the front right.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,534 |
Are you measuring them on the car?
The difference between the two sizes you mentioned is about 2.3%. So depending on your rpms at highway speed, the difference will be less than 100rpm. You're going to need 15s to make a dent in the highway rpm.
If you get the right backspace you could probably fit a 255/60R15 on the rear and a 215/65R15 on the front. Still if you do the math, that's only a 4% difference compared to what you have today. So for example if before you were cruising at 3000rpm, it's only dropping to about 2875 (a 225 rpm drop).
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439 |
Mike, I measured them on the car. I'm only looking to drop 200 - 300 rpm, so going to 15's should work. I've been using this link for calculations; http://www.hotrodpitstop.com/tools.html#1
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 856
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 856 |
I used 15's on the rear and 14's on the front.
As seen in pic the front sits high with 15's(235-60-15)on the front.
second pic is 14's on front(24.5 in tall)and 15 on rear(26.6 Tall).
Helps keep the nose down at higher speeds.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889 |
As others point out, increasing a size up tire or increasing rim size will not effect the RPM's that much. The best way would be to change differential ratio.
Tom '69 Firebird 400 4spd conv
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,341
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,341 |
I agree, I don't beleive I noticed any drop in RPMs to be honest. And I went from 215/60/14 to 225/70/15, I guess it probably did drop a bit, but not enough to notice...
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439 |
Thanks for this info guys. Gives me something to think about. Since I just did a ratio swap in the fall and have barely driven the car since, I can't bring myself to switching ratios again. I drive 90% in the city but do like to head out for an extended road trip once in awhile. I'm just nervous about running 3000+ rpms at highway speeds for extended periods. I think I'm still gun-shy from my overheating NIGHTMARE last summer!  If I had to do it again, I wouldn't have gone with 3.55's. Should have dropped down a ratio. Although I am really happy with the "get up and go" off the line now! So it sounds like the added expense of 15" wheels and tires may not be the answer. Hmmmm........... 
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889
Senior Member
|
|
Senior Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,889 |
I've found the 3.23 is a great ratio for both acceleration and top end. The 3.55 is a good one for off the line, but top out to quick for freeway use... unless you have a OHC-6.
Last edited by if6was9; 02/03/09 09:08 PM.
Tom '69 Firebird 400 4spd conv
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Member
|
|
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 439 |
I've found the 3.23 is a great ratio for both acceleration and top end. The 3.55 is a good one for off the line, but top out to quick for freeway use... unless you have a OHC-6. Yep, that's what I'm finding. 3.23 would be the way to go.
|
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,341
Power Member
|
|
Power Member
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 6,341 |
I am running 3.55 and at 80mph I am turning 4k RPM. So all in all I am very happy with my ratio/combo. the 3.55 w/ the 2.56 first gear is an awesome combo off the line. Love it!
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics35,534
Posts298,850
Members8,862
| |
Most Online19,810 Feb 1st, 2026
|
|
|
1 members (Dr. Drivability),
1,839
guests, and
212
robots. |
|
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|