got a reply by Ccass after I asked "why"? and here is his reply , with my reply abv it.....funny that I`m banned from the forum ,yet he copies me a link to read on it, and I cant read it since I cant get in as I`m banned...LOL
Quote:
Chris, I appreciate the explanation ,even though I`m banned from looking at what you copied for me to read....so I cannot read that ,nor can I read your new policy......plus I never read that a moderator should be suspended...all I know is that I said “ imo no” where it was asked if an un moderated forum should be moderated.....of course I know forums aren’t democracies...I moderate on FGF myself....and we banned one person from there, one that you guys later banned from PY too... When you say : Your participation was minimal and you were somewhat a casualty of what transpired the last two days but it's only for 2 weeks Its like I`m innocent but guilty by association....being in the same thread?
But then you say : with Baker's topic polling the membership about whether a moderator should be suspended and the topic you participated in
But these guys were suspended I hear from other members, and Baker isn’t even in that group...makes no sense 242177P Bigunde Bjorn Pontiac Dude Bob Rutledge MZBK21 brucewilkie I will take “one for the team", but it will be a long time before I return , if ever..... I`m sure you`ll understand... It was nice as long as it lasted.....met a lot of nice people , made lots of good friends.....
Bjorn ++++++++++++++ Bjorn, Your post on this page http://forums.performanceyears.com/forums/showthread.php?t=663230. Normally this would be considered a completely harmless post but with Baker's topic polling the membership about whether a moderator should be suspended and the topic you participated in, it was absolutely necessary to remind everyone that the CH is not a democracy. So everyone that bandwagon'd the ridiculous notion that those that made the rules can't change their own rules, got suspended for 2 weeks. Just read my post and read the new CH etiquette. It's very clear. Overall your contributions are very much appreciated and I know you are a well respected member. Your participation was minimal and you were somewhat a casualty of what transpired the last two days but it's only for 2 weeks. I didn't feel it fair to pick and choose who 'deserved' to be suspended. So I suspended everyone who addressed the moderator issue in a negative manner. I hope you understand and can take one for the team.
so, in case you`re associated with complainers you`ll get suspended.....not like " innocent until proven guilty", not even a check ,asking....no chance of defending yourself....just a casualty...but ,"its only for 2 weeks".... hmmm, like an innocent " criminal" feels better because he was innocent ,but only sent to prison for 2 years....LOL
I dont buy it. For you who used to see me on PY, you`ll know why you wont in the future